One of John Malone’s lucrative investments was a seed investment in Black Entertainment Television (BET). In 1979, he invested $180,000 for a 20% equity stake in BET. He loaned another $320,000, which could be drawn down over time. In 2000, Viacom purchased BET for $3.2 billion in stock. Malone received $850 million, an amazing return.

The founders of BET, Robert “Bob” Johnson and Sheila Johnson, received stock worth $1.4 billion. I was intrigued to learn more about their journeys as founders, especially since they were a husband–wife team with no prior media experience.

Sheila’s autobiography, Walk Through Fire: A Memoir of Love, Loss, and Triumph, came out last year, and I started reading it yesterday. She was an entrepreneur before starting BET with Bob, and she went on to start and buy into several businesses after BET. I’m not finished with the book yet, but I can already see that Shelia provides her unique perspective on what happened behind the scenes as she built a billion-dollar company with her husband.

Sheila talks extensively about how Bob, as CEO, didn’t have a vision for BET and lacked values. He focused on generating profits and revenue by any means necessary. While the company was successful financially, BET’s programming wasn’t something she was proud of. The company’s culture was also less than stellar. The misalignment between Sheila and Bob around culture and values is what led to the company being sold. In the end, the outcome was financially rewarding, but the journey to get there was rough on Shelia and her family and left lasting scars on them.

This autobiography is different from others I’ve read. Sheila is candid and raw about the extreme highs and lows she encountered before and after BET. I’m looking forward to finishing it this weekend.

This is my two-hundred-fourteenth weekly reflection. Here are my takeaways from this week:

• Audio blog – I launched an audio version of my blog last week on Apple and Spotify (see here and here). Hearing my own voice feels weird. But listening to these recordings is a great feedback loop. I can critique myself and make changes (or try to) rapidly. I still need to get in the habit of recording and posting. It feels unnatural now, and I’m not in a rhythm. Hopefully, it will be second nature by the end of the month.
• Written vs. audio – A written piece that communicates an idea clearly to a reader doesn’t communicate that same idea as clearly to someone who’s listening to a recording of it.
• Concision – Listening to my recordings highlights something I already knew: I’m not as concise as I’d like to be. I think I’ll improve over time if I work at it.
• John Malone – I enjoyed the book about John Malone. It was interesting to see how a non-founder built a massive company and how important the cable industry is to our ability to access the internet. Malone’s specialty is financial engineering, and it was also interesting to learn more about how he used that skillset to increase shareholder value.

Week two hundred fourteen was another week of learning. Looking forward to next week!

I finished reading Cable Cowboy: John Malone and the Rise of the Modern Cable-TV Business. I learned a ton about Malone as well as the cable industry and its importance in technological evolution.

Cable systems own and are responsible for the wires that deliver digital information to and from consumers’ homes. This book illuminated the impact that cable companies have had on life as we know it, how valuable their last-mile delivery service has been over the years, and why they made John Malone a billionaire.

Cable has gone through three periods:

• Antenna extension – In the 1950s, the big three broadcast networks (ABC, NBC, and CBS) ruled television, but their signals didn’t reach rural areas. Rural residents couldn’t watch the evening news or shows enjoyed by large and medium-sized towns. Cable entrepreneurs erected large antennas to pull down broadcast signals from TV stations in larger cities nearby. They ran wires to rural homes to pump the pirated broadcast signals to rural residents. These entrepreneurs charged a monthly fee but paid nothing for programming. Cable systems were antenna extensions that made broadcast networks more accessible.
• Programming – Regulators outlawed the pirating of broadcast signals in the 1970s. In 1975, the upstart HBO and cable system owner Time Inc. used satellites to broadcast to consumers the Ali–Frazier boxing match live from the Philippines. This was revolutionary then and something the big three broadcasters couldn’t pull off. Satellites transformed cable economics. Programming exploded, with channels such as ESPN, Showtime, WGN, CNN, and BET launching. Demand for cable service in urban areas also exploded, kicking off a rush to wire every home in America for cable.
• Internet – By the 1990s, it was internet usage that was exploding in America. The internet was the future, but accessing it was still painful. Dial-up services, such as America Online (AOL), were slow. Cable became the best option for delivering fast internet access to homes. Internet entrepreneurs, including Microsoft’s Bill Gates and Paul Allen, each spent several billion dollars buying into cable companies so they could own part of the infrastructure delivering the products and services tech entrepreneurs created. Cable companies went from mainly providing access to unique programming to also providing access to the World Wide Web.

Malone was recruited to TCI in 1972, at the end of the antenna extension era, and was CEO until the company was sold to AT&T for $48 billion in 1998. While Malone couldn't have predicted how technology would evolve over his decades as CEO, he recognized the value in what TCI had. A direct line into American homes. A way to get data and information in and out of homes. His genius was keeping a finger on the pulse of where technology was going and partnering with the entrepreneurs building technology that improved consumers’ lives. Over the years, TCI partnered with and owned stakes in programming channels, satellite companies, cable box manufacturers, internet companies, and others while continually building its cable system and increasing the number of subscribers.

Malone’s career highlights to me that to have outsize success, predicting where technology is going isn’t necessary. Sometimes, owning the infrastructure that new technologies will likely rely on for distribution will be lucrative and allow you to continually benefit through numerous technology cycles.

I caught up with a friend who’s seasoned in the restaurant industry. He’s helped build some of the most successful restaurants in Atlanta. He’s now taking his experience and opening a consultancy focused on helping restaurateurs run their restaurants efficiently and profitably.

During our chat, he told me he encounters a problem with some clients: they won’t share their costs with him. Their explanations vary, but the result is the same. Without seeing all the costs, he can’t tell whether the restaurant is profitable or how efficient it is. His ability to add value is severely hampered.

Many years ago, when I was an early-stage founder, I was lucky enough to land a meeting with someone who had a $300+ million-annual-revenue business. He was busy, and I wanted to make the most of the meeting. I prepared my financials and presented them to him as soon as we sat down. He looked at the numbers, peppered me with questions, and started sharing relevant experiences and making suggestions. Seeing the numbers helped him quickly understand the current state of my business and identify where he could add value. The meeting was transformative for my business. The seasoned entrepreneur thanked me for being transparent, trusting him, and coming prepared. We remained friends for years after that.

Entrepreneurs are sometimes reluctant to share their financial data. Often, that’s the right decision. You don’t want your numbers floating around. You also don’t want to take advice from people without relevant experience. But when you’re seeking input from credible people who want to help your business succeed, the risk/reward ratio changes. The upside to sharing your data dwarfs the downside. In those cases, it’s often worth being an open book (after your adviser has assured you that they won’t share your data). One idea or comment from a credible person can propel your business forward or help it avoid trouble you didn’t see coming.

As I’ve been reading Cable Cowboy: John Malone and the Rise of the Modern Cable-TV Business, I’ve gotten a clearer picture of John Malone. Malone is brilliant and shrewd. I’d consider him more of a financial engineer than anything else. He excelled at deal making, strategy, and capital allocation—but not at building a cable service customers loved or a company that was sustainable long-term.

Between 1973 and 1989, he completed 482 deals, or one every two weeks or so. From the company’s low in 1974, not long after Malone joined, through mid 1989, the stock rose 55,000 percent, a spectacular return.

Malone’s constant deal making created remarkable shareholder value. But it came at a cost. Customers hated TCI. Malone’s goal was to charge as much as possible for his service but spend as little providing it as he could get away with. This strategy maximized cash flow but resulted in notoriously poor customer service, massive rate hikes, unreliable service technicians, and inconsistent cable service. TCI’s poor reputation with customers and its business practices (including others not mentioned here) led to Malone being forced to appear before Congress to defend himself and TCI’s business practices. He and various state and federal politicians became enemies. TCI’s shareholders were happy, but Malone and the company were under constant attack.

Malone was in a service-oriented business selling to consumers, but he didn’t approach it that way. He focused on engineering financial outcomes, not making customers happy. He got the financial returns he wanted, but he and TCI were vilified by customers, politicians, and competitors. It all took a toll on Malone over the years. As I read this part of the book, I couldn’t help but wonder if all the hate he encountered was worth it. Couldn’t he have gotten a similar outcome if he built something people loved, not hated?

Last week I learned about John Malone while reading The Outsiders: Eight Unconventional CEOs and Their Radically Rational Blueprint for Success. This inspired me to buy and begin reading Cable Cowboy: John Malone and the Rise of the Modern Cable-TV Business.

Tele-Communications Inc. (TCI) was a cable company founded by rancher and cottonseed salesman Bob Magness. TCI laid wires to allow cable to reach homes and charged monthly fees for access to its infrastructure and programming.

Magness used debt to expand TCI and got in over his head. In 1972, he recruited Malone to get the company’s finances in order and take it to the next level.

Malone focused on increasing the long-term value of TCI, not short-term profits. He ignored reported profits and concentrated on the company’s cash flows, not net income. He reinvested cash flow in ways that would generate a high return and increase TCI’s market capitalization (i.e., valuation). Here are two key things I noticed Malone did:

• Depreciation – Cable systems were depreciable assets. Once a system was acquired, TCI depreciated this cost over time, which minimized (and often eliminated) TCI’s tax bill. The lower the tax bill, the more cash TCI had to buy more cable systems. The more cable systems TCI purchased, the more cash flow Malone had to reinvest and the more depreciation lowered TCI’s tax bill. The bigger the system became, the more subscribers Malone had to use as leverage in negotiations.  
• Programming – Cable system operators thought programming was a commodity they had to pay for. Malone realized programming companies were valuable because they had two revenue streams: advertising and payments from cable systems (like TCI) based on subscribers. New channels increased fees to cable systems as popularity increased. Malone realized that owning part of new programming (i.e., new cable channels) would allow TCI to profit twice by owning “both the pipe and the water flowing through it.” He could offer new channels broad distribution early and negotiate lower programming rates for TCI, a win-win. Malone started seeding new cable networks. He provided capital and access to subscribers in his system in exchange for 20% of new programming channels.

Malone ended up building a powerful flywheel that increased TCI’s long-term value. The more cable systems he bought, the more cash flow and subscribers he had. The more subscribers and cash he had, the more leverage he had with new cable channels. The more these new channels succeeded, the more revenue they had and the more valuable they became. The more valuable new programmers became, the more valuable TCI became.

Using this approach, Malone ended up owning stakes in BET, the Discovery Channel, the Family Channel, and others.

I haven’t finished the book yet, but I can already see why Malone is considered one of the best capital allocators.

I’ve recently read books about two founders who founded massive publicly traded companies, but in different ways: Pierre Omidyar, founder of eBay, and Willis Johnson, founder of Copart. Both companies offer online auctions. As of this writing, eBay has a market capitalization of roughly $27 billion, while the Copart valuation is roughly $53 billion.

Omidyar worked in Silicon Valley and was financially comfortable after a previous employer was acquired. He thought the world was unnecessarily unfair economically. He envisioned an efficient market that empowered people financially so they could control their own lives. His mission was to create an online auction with a strong community. His vision- and mission-first approach led to his nailing product–market fit straight out of the gate. The company went from zero to $41.7 million in revenue and was publicly traded on the stock market in three short years.

Johnson didn’t want to work for anyone but needed to support his family. He knew the salvage industry and started a salvage yard because he knew he could make money. As more problems presented themselves and money-making opportunities arose, he took them on too. After twenty years of opportunistically solving various problems, the rapid success of his online auction market in 2003 caused him to question his “job.” He shifted his mission from solving various salvage problems for profit to “streamline and simplify the auction process.” Johnson’s twenty-year transition from mercenary to missionary led to unprecedented growth at Copart. It’s now a global online auction market.

I, too, began as a mercenary when I started my company. I wanted more control over my life and needed to replace the salary from the job I’d had. I went from problem to problem with a focus on profitability. Years later, after I had financial breathing room, I started to focus on the painful problems. I became something of a missionary. This led to $10 million in annual revenue, but that could have been $300 million if I’d gone full missionary. I should have been laser-focused on our customers’ most painful problem.  

As I thought about my founder friends and myself, I realized that Johnson’s journey is most common among my peers. Most of them picked a market and focused on making money to support themselves. They often attempted to solve various problems. But my friends who had outsize success didn’t stick with that approach. When their companies began to grow rapidly, it was because they were laser-focused on a single problem and mission. Their outsize success was the result of converting to being missionary founders, often after they had financial breathing room.

Entrepreneurs wanting financial independence and control of their lives can accomplish these goals as mercenaries, but if they aspire to have a bigger impact or build something significant, crystallizing a vision and mission is likely the key.

I’ve been thinking about sharing my daily posts in an audio format in addition to the written format. My self-imposed deadline was to get it done by Friday, April 26. I met that deadline and launched via Spotify. Apple Podcasts and Spotify are the two largest distribution platforms for podcasts, so I want to be on both.

Today, I finished setting up everything with Apple. My posts can now be heard on Apple Podcasts. I need to tidy things up a bit, but I’m live!

Feel free to check out my blog on Apple Podcasts.

This is my two-hundred-thirteenth weekly reflection. Here are my takeaways from this week:

• Audio blog – I launched an audio version of my blog this week. I still need to fine-tune things and expand to other platforms, such as Apple Podcast, but the first box is checked. I’m excited about what I’ll gain from this experience. It feels like the next evolution of my learning in public. You can check out the audio blog’s Spotify page here.
• Entrepreneurial groups – I spent time learning about groups like EO, YPO, Vistage, and Tiger 21 that are attractive to entrepreneurs. While doing so, I also learned about their business models. I was shocked at how much revenue these organizations generate. If revenue is a proxy for value, they’re bringing tremendous value to founders.
• Distilling – I’m still not where I want to be in distilling and documenting what I’m learning from the books I’m reading. I want to focus on this more next week.

Week two hundred thirteen was another week of learning. Looking forward to next week!

Today, I finished reading Junk to Gold: From Salvage to the World’s Largest Online Auto Auction, an autobiography of Copart founder Willis Johnson. Johnson founded Copart in 1982. It started as a salvage yard. He purchased wrecked cars and sold the parts and scrap metal for a profit.

Johnson picked the salvage market because it was supported by two larger industries. Car manufacturers had to produce cars or they’d go out of business. Insurance companies had to write car insurance policies or they’d go out of business. “They’re always gonna make cars, and they’re always gonna insure them. We’re the guy in between.” The salvage business was important because it sat between the two and helped dispose of wrecked or inoperable cars, which are inevitable.

Johnson started with a salvage yard but was always scanning the landscape, paying attention to what was happening around him and searching for the next thing. He started a pick-your-own-parts yard and other businesses as opportunities cropped up. Over the years, he realized that providing a place to auction salvaged cars helped insurance companies recoup more money—and insurance companies were great repeat customers.

He continued to iterate on the auction model. In 2003, Copart rolled out an online auction platform. The platform was a tremendous success. Johnson realized he was on to something big and began to ask himself, What is our job? which I translate to What’s our mission? Up to this point, he’d been chasing anything that could make money. But now, the online platform’s success changed his thinking. He’d found product–market fit but wasn’t sure what to do with the in-person auctions and other businesses. Where should he spend his time? What was the biggest opportunity? He realized that his mission was to “streamline and simplify the auction process.” With a clear mission, his decisions were easy. He ended in-person auctions. All auctions would be online going forward.

Having a clear mission and product–market fit took Copart on an unprecedented run. The company is now a global online auction market and has a market capitalization (i.e., valuation) of over $52 billion as of this writing.

I enjoyed learning about Johnson’s journey. The distance he traveled was impressive. He doesn’t have a college degree and isn’t technical, but he nevertheless built a massive company centered on technology. Johnson’s business was founded in 1982 and started trading on the NASDAQ stock exchange in 1994. It took nine more years for him to crystallize his mission and focus on a single solution with massive potential in 2003.

Johnson hustled in the salvage industry for twenty years before he found product–market fit. When that happened, he switched from hustling to being laser focused.

Johnson’s journey is unconventional, even by entrepreneurial standards, but his success is outsize and undeniable. His story reminds us that there are many paths to success as an entrepreneur, including unsexy paths like the salvage industry. In the end, it boils down to finding a painful problem, solving that problem well, and providing the solution to a large pool of people or businesses.